Get Permission Manjunatha and Patil: Knowledge sharing practice through LMS: Perspectives of faculty members affiliated to Mysore University


Introduction

Advancements in Information Technology (IT), like many other disciplines, have revolutionized the education sector by opening new methods of learning and knowledge sharing.1 Significance of information and knowledge sharing among learners worldwide as the WWW is one of the most convenient and effective way to obtain and publish information.2 In addition, sharing of knowledge among teachers in the physical class environment has been enhanced and accentuate by the convenience and ability to seek desired information to help from other web users globally.3 Though knowledge exchanges among teachers and students through face-to-face interactions should not be overlooked as these essentially facilitate achieving desired outcomes of collective learning, technology based knowledge sharing also has an important role. 4 Online Learning Management System (LMS) has become popular during and post COVID scenario. The Department of Collegiate Education, Government of Karnataka (DCE) also took a notice of this development and introduced its own Karnataka Learning Management System (Karnataka LMS) which is being actively utilized by the academic community. There is a need to investigate the influence of Karnataka LMS portal on knowledge sharing amongst educators and hence this study.5

Knowledge Sharing Practices Among Academic Professionals

Knowledge Management involves the management of all aspects of the knowledge management process from acquisition to sharing and innovation. The most relevant aspect of the knowledge process is knowledge sharing.6 There are two types of knowledge, which are tacit and explicit. Explicit knowledge is characterised by ease of expression in terms of words spoken or written in print media in all types and sorts. It can be manifested as tables, manuals, white papers, books, magazines, audio, video and images.7 In contrast, tacit knowledge is obscure and not easily clear and not fully expressed. Such knowledge could be shared only by way of learning by doing or close interaction between people.8

Major channels used in knowledge sharing

Knowledge sharing encompasses diverse methods of exchanging information, skills, and expertise. It can be facilitated through formal channels like teaching/lecturing or informal interactions like discussions.9 Technology plays a crucial role in knowledge sharing, enabling seamless access to vast reservoirs of information through online platforms, social media, and collaborative tools.10 These are discussed below:

Lecture

Lecture is an appropriate medium to share theoretical knowledge. 11 Usually, a lecture involves communicating with a large number of students when the interactive element is limited. The lecturer would distribute lecture notes or teach the lesson by using slides. The lecture notes and slide will be the guide for the students to study for the final examination, tests and quizzes and they will search for other additional information from the books in the library or online information from the internet. 12

Social networking

Social networking has gained big attention because the user can communicate informally or formally. A student actively uses social networks to know and discuss the assignment and ask virtually after the lecture. Both mutual interaction between a student and a teacher and also a collective discussion is possible which makes knowledge sharing dynamic and seamless.13

e-learning portals

E-learning portals serve as digital platforms facilitating remote education, offering a diverse range of courses and resources accessible to learners worldwide. Employing multimedia elements, interactive features, and user-friendly interfaces, these portals enhance the flexibility and accessibility of educational content, catering to diverse learning styles. 14 They play a pivotal role in the evolution of contemporary education, fostering anytime, anywhere learning.

Leaning Management Portals as Mainstay e-leaning Portals

Learning Management System (LMS) e-learning portals have integral to modern education, providing centralized platforms for course administration, content delivery, and assessment. These systems streamline educational processes, fostering interactive and collaborative learning experiences. LMS portals enable educators to organize, track, and manage online courses efficiently, enhancing the overall effectiveness and accessibility of e-learning initiatives in academic settings.

Karnataka LMS portal

The Karnataka Learning Management System (KLMS) is a cloud-based platform that provides educational resources and tools to students and educators in the state of Karnataka. It is developed and maintained by Department of collegiate Education, Government of Karnataka. The colleges will have Wi-Fi that allows students to download content while on the premises through a commonly created login credentials. These resources can be accesses through offline also. Each and every module of a particular subject has sixty minutes long video made by subject experts, demonstrate and explain the concept of the content which relevant to current syllabus.KLMS has been implemented in 430 colleges, 87 polytechnics, and 14 engineering institutes benefitting 4.5 lakh students.

The primary objective of this digital initiative is to move the curricula of educational institutions like schools and colleges online and into digital format, 5, 15

Background to the study

LMS e learning portal was established with a goal to support the information needs of the host institution. 5 It was expected that knowledge gained from the use of the e-learning materials through the information resources consulted would lead to knowledge sharing amongst teachers. After initial reluctance to accept and to adopt this initiative this portal is now well utilized by the college teachers and student community as well for knowledge sharing necessitating an examination of the perception of teaching community about this setup for knowledge sharing. 16

Statement of the problem

Every higher education institution has the primary functions of teaching, research and facilitating learning, teaching activities carried out in form of lectures and assignments are given to ensure that learning has taken place. The state of knowledge sharing is perceived to be poor among teachers. Consequently, teachers and students may embrace the mentality of hoarding knowledge to gain academic advantage against other students, thereby reducing knowledge sharing. 17 The LMS initiative by the Department of Collegiate Education, Government of Karnataka looks to fill this void by giving alternate means of information resource and a new way of knowledge sharing amongst its users. There is a need to study and measure the efficacy of this initiative.

Objective of the Study

The general objective of this study is to find out the effect of LMS use on knowledge sharing among teachers belonging to various colleges affiliated to Mysore University

The specific objectives are as follows:

  1. To find out the extent to which academician use LMS portal to share their knowledge

  2. To ascertain the level of knowledge sharing amongst faculty members

  3. To identify the challenges faced by teachers in the use of the LMS for knowledge sharing.

Research questions

  1. To what extent usage of LMS portal influences knowledge sharing among faculty members of Mysore University affiliated colleges?

  2. What is the level of knowledge sharing amongst teachers?

  3. What are the challenges faced by teachers in the use of the LMS portal for knowledge sharing?

Hypotheses

  1. HO1: There is no significant relationship between awareness and utilisation of LMS portal by academic scholars.

  2. H02: There is no significant relationship between perception and utilisation of LMS portal by academic scholars.

  3. H03: There is no significant relationship between awareness and perception of LMS portal by academic scholars.

Significance of the study

This study will bring out to what level academicians are using LMS Portal for knowledge sharing and it will also increase the awareness and importance of knowledge sharing among academic community. 18 Furthermore, awareness of LMS portal and services among teachers will be increased. This study will add to the literature on LMS portal and knowledge sharing because only a few studies have been carried from this perspective.

Scope of the study

This study is limited to theuse of LMS portal developed and administrated by Department of Collegiate and Technical Education, Government of Karnataka and knowledge sharing among teachers of Mysore University. It will specifically cover e-resources, tacit and explicit knowledge. This study will be carried out among teachers belongs to various colleges affiliated to Mysore university. Finally, this research limited to the periodfromJune 2023 to July 2023.

Methodology

In this study, a survey design was adopted. This is appropriate because it provides an excellent way to examine respondents' opinion towards the studied variables. It also helps to determine the relationship between the variables under examination 9. This design was used to gather information from a representative sample of the population under study. The population for this study comprise of faculty members belonging to Mysore University.Previous research about knowledge sharing was conducted and questionnaires were used to measure the response of participants.

Sampling technique and sample size

The sampling technique adopted for this study was the purposive sampling technique. This was necessary because the criterion for respondents' selection is the use of the LMS Portal. Hence, to calculate the sample size for this study, Krejcie and Morgan 19 method was adopted, if the given population was 1000000 then the required sample size would have to be 384.

Data analysis, results and discussion of findings

This part details the presentation of data analysis and interpretation from the instrument of data collection used for the study. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. IBM SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. Three hundred and eighty-four (384) copies of the questionnaire were distributed, retrieved and validated for data analysis constituting 312 questionnaires with81.25per cent response rate.

Data analysis begins by depicting the respondents' demographic characteristics, thereafter, answered the research questions raised for the study. Finally, a test of hypotheses is carried out among variables of interest.

Presentation of Results

Table 1

Demographic information of respondents

Variables

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Gender

Male

173

55.45

Female

139

44.55

Age range

25-35 years

67

21.47

36-45 years

153

49.04

46-55 years

77

24.68

56 years and above

15

04.81

Designation

Assistant Professor

186

59.61

Associate Professor

94

30.13

College Librarian

14

04.49

Physical Education Director

18

05.77

Length of Service

0-5 years

96

30.77

6-10 years

84

26.92

11-15 years

77

24.68

16-20 years

30

09.62

More than 20 years

25

08.01

Total

312

100.00

Table 1 shows that the study was male-dominated because male respondents had 55.45 per cent representation (n=173), while thefemale had44.55 per cent representation (n=139). Also, the study participants were predominantly between the age categories of 0-5 years (n=96, 30.77%) while those that were more than 20 years of age (n=25, 8.01%) were the least represented in the study. Finally, the most represented level of teachers was Assistant professor (n=186, 59.61%), while the least represented designation was college librarians (n=14, 04.49%).

Table 2

Frequency of usage of the LMS portal by faculty.

Academic status

Many times in a day

Daily

Alternate days

Weekly

Fortnightly

Monthly

Rarely

PG students

2(3.08)

11(8.40)

2(4.08)

3(10.34)

0(0.00)

0(0.00)

4(44.44)

Research Scholars

6(9.23)

14(10.69)

2(4.08)

1(3.45)

2(11.11)

1(9.09)

0(0.00)

Assistant Professors

32(49.23)

61(46.56)

3(6.12)

2(6.90)

4(22.22)

2(18.18)

0(0.00)

Associate Professors

18(27.69)

27(20.61)

21(42.86)

8(27.59)

3(16.67)

2(18.18)

2(22.22)

Professor

6(9.23)

14(10.69)

13(26.53)

14(48.28)

7(38.89)

6(54.55)

0(0.00)

Librarian

1(1.54)

4(3.05)

8(16.33)

1(3.45)

2(11.11)

0(0.00)

3(33.33)

Total

65 (20.83)

131 (41.99)

49 (15.71)

29 (9.29)

18 (5.77)

11 (3.53)

9(2.88)

Table 2 shows the frequency of visits to the LMS Portal by the faculty. Daily visit to the portal had the highest 41.99 per cent representation (n= 131), while rare visit had the least count of 2.88 per cent representation (n=9)

Figure 1

Frequency of LMS portalvisit by the faculty members.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/34a89bf4-bec5-481a-9edf-646e6df52c31image1.png

From Figure 1, 41.99 percent (n=131) of the faculty members log on to the LMS portal, which is created and maintained by the Department of Collegiate and Technical Education , Government of Karnataka shows how faculty of Mysore University affiliated colleges positively utilizing to create and share the knowledge to the academic community of higher education in Karnataka. Interestingly 20.83 percent (n=65) of faculty members visiting to LMS portal several times in day, it shows how much zeal for e-learning portal by academic community.

Table 3

To what extent do faculty members use LMS portal to share their resources?

Resources

The

HE

TLE

VR

N

Mean

Average Mean

Lecture videos   

181 (58.01)

42 (13.46)

51 (16.35)

36 (11.54)

02 (0.64)

4.17

3.56

Online discussion

128 (41.03)

81 (25.96)

38 (12.18)

41 (13.14)

24 (7.69)

3.79

Notes    

69 (22.12)

41 (13.14)

78 (25.00)

110 (35.26)

14 (4.49)

3.13

Online quiz

38 (12.18)

110 (35.26)

71 (22.76)

49 (15.71)

44 (14.10)

3.16

THE=To High Extent, HE= High Extent, TLE= To Low Extent, VR= Very Rarely, N = Never

From Table 3 it becomes evident that teachers used LMS portal to a large extent (Average mean 3.56). This shows that generally, college teachers use LMS portal to share their knowledge. However teachers concentrate on uploading lecture videos (Average mean 4.17) than online discussion (Average mean 3.79), besides, on average, college teachers shows less interest on conducting online quiz (Average mean 3.16). Sharing notes finds the least position indicating more importance towards digital content.

Table 4

Challenges faced by faculty members while using LMS portal

Challenging factors   

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Mean

Lack of IT infrastructure

174 (55.77)

59 (18.91)

17 (5.45)

39 (12.50)

23 (7.37)

4.03

Lack of knowledge sharing Culture among academic Community

196 (62.82)

61 (19.55)

11 (3.53)

18 (5.77)

26 (8.33)

4.23

Inadequate e- resources at LMS Portal

59 (18.91)

126 (40.38)

39 (12.50)

41 (13.14)

47 (15.06)

3.35

Excess academic workload

156 (50.00)

114 (36.54)

08 (2.56)

23 (7.37)

11 (3.53)

4.22

Students prefers off-line Over on-line mode

201 (64.42)

72 (23.08)

03 (0.96)

14 (4.49)

22 (7.05)

4.33

Mysore university affiliated college teachers agreed that they faced many challenges in the use of LMS portal. The respondents pointed out that students preferred to attend regular physical classes rather than online classes, which is a major challenge in promoting and using LMS portal to share their knowledge (Average mean 4.33) as can be seen from the Table 4 In addition to this, teachers admitted that they strongly faced the following challenges; lack of knowledge sharing culture among colleagues (Average mean 4.23), excess academic workload also crucial role in promoting LMS portal (Average mean 4.22). This indicates there are many challenges to promote and use LMS Portal for sharing explicit as well as tacit knowledge for teachers.

Test of hypothesis

H01: There is no significant relationship between awareness and utilisation of LMS portal by academic scholars.

Table 5

1LMS portal service utilisation

Variable

N

Mean

Std. D

r

Sig.

Remark

Awareness of LMS

312

11.65

3.87

.182

.000

Significant

Utilisation of LMS portal

312

9.13

3.01

Table 6

Relationship between perception and extent of LMS utilisation

Variable

N

Mean

Std. D

r

Sig.

Remark

Utilisation of LMS

312

9.13

3.07

.161

.000

Significant

Perception on importance of LMS

312

13.61

3.61

Table 7

elationship between awareness and perception of LMS portal

Variable

N

Mean

Std. D

r

Sig.

Remark

Awareness of LMS

312

11.65

3.91

.131

.000

Significant

Perception on importance of LMS

312

13.61

3.08

Table 5 shows that there is a positive significant relationship between awareness and utilisation of LMS portal (r = 0.191; p < 0.05). Therefore H01 is rejected. The positive relationship implies that increase in awareness brings about increase in utilisation. The simple linear Regression model indicates that LMS portal utilisation significantly influences the explicit as well as tacit knowledge sharing (p< 0.05). This suggests that the utilisation of LMS portal significantly influence the explicit and tacit knowledge sharing.

H02: There is no significant between perception of the importance of LMS Portal and LMS utilisation

Table 6 reported that there is a positive significant relationship between perception and importance of LMS and LMS utilisation (r = 0.19; p < 0.05). Therefore H02 is rejected. The positive relationship implies that increase in the perception of the importance of LMS brings about increase in utilisation.

H03: There is no significant relationship between awareness of LMS and perception of the importance of LMS portal

Table 7 revealed that there is a positive significant relationship between awareness of LMS and perception of the importance of LMS (r = 0.12; p < 0.05). Therefore H03 is rejected. The positive relationship implies that increase in the awareness of LMS, brings about increase in the perception of the importance of LMS portal which is developed and maintained by Department of Collegiate Education, Government of Karnataka.

Conclusion

This research investigates the individual knowledge sharing behaviour among academic scholars affiliated with the University of Mysore. The findings reveal that a predominant majority of the academic staff exhibits a positive disposition towards knowledge sharing. However, challenges impede the promotion and utilization of the Learning Management System (LMS) Portal for Knowledge Sharing. Addressing these limitations necessitates the provision of robust IT infrastructure, including a reliable Internet connection. Additionally, fostering awareness within the student community through targeted workshops emerges as a viable strategy for overcoming these barriers.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

C Wei C Choy Knowledge sharing patterns of Undergraduate studentsLibr Rev201261532744

2 

A Elogie Knowledge sharing behaviourr of academics in Univeristy of Ibadan. Ibadan, Nigeria: University of Ibadan2010

3 

N Anna D Puspitasari Knowledge shairng in Libraries. IFLALICIFLALIC. Singapore.2013

4 

L Tsui S Chapman L Schnier S Stewart Knowlege Sharing handbookCambridge University Press2006143

5 

T Commissionar LMS portal. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from Department of Collegiate Education: 2021https://karnatakalms.com/

6 

F Babalhavaeji K Jafazadeh Knowledge sharing bahaviour influencesMalays J Libr Infof Sci2011161114

7 

MO Igbinovia N Osuchukwu Predictors of knowledge sharing behaviour on Sustainable Development Goals among library personnel in NigeriaIFLA J201844211931

8 

M Abdur-Rafiu AO Opesade Knowledge sharing behaviour of academics in the polytechnic. Library Philosophy and practiceLAP Lambert Academic Publishing2015152

9 

MD A Islam M Ikeda MD M Islam Knowledge sharing behaviour influences: A study of Information Science and Library Management faculties in BangladeshIFLA J201339322134

10 

SR Ghani Knowledge management: Tools and techniquesJ Libr Inf Technol20093341

11 

S Wang R Noe Knowledge Sharing : A Review and Directions for future researchHuman Resource management Review2010115131

12 

S Goh M Sandhu Knowledge sharing among Malaysian academicsElectronic J Knowledge Manag20133848

13 

S Jeon J Koh An Integrative model for knowledge sharing in communitites of practiceJ Knowledge Manag201125169

14 

A Hewlitt L Lamoureux Introducing Knowledge Sharing Methods and Tools: A Facilitator's GuideIDRCNew Delhi2010132

15 

O Osunade O Philips Limitations of knowledge sharing in academic. Knowledge Manag Develop J2007312634

16 

M Helsinki Knowledge sharing practices in acadmic libraries with special reference to the Unisa LibraryCape Town, South Africa2013https://open.uct.ac.za/items/047a7dc0-2f71-41b3-86f4-a4c6f9268bbf/full

17 

I Ajiferuke Role of Information professionals in knowlege management programs: emperical evidence from CanadaInforming Sci J2003624757

18 

D Paulin K Suneson Knowledge Sharing Behaviour by Librarians in Federal Universities in NigeriaElectronic J Knowl Manag2012612033

19 

RV Krejcie DW Morgan Determining sample size for research activitiesEduc Psychol Meas197030360710



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 19-11-2023

Accepted : 11-12-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijlsit.2023.016


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 917

PDF Downloaded: 169



Medical Abbreviation List